The Article on Wikipedia is done very well. From my reading of the article I did not get any bias’s from the article. And the article was a decent length, it was not to short or too long. Along with the length, it had some very interesting information over the topic. I clicked the links to about 15 different sources on the article and almost all of the links took me to some sort of academic online PDF, or a book. But a few of the articles to me to pages that either were where it said file not found or the site was not up to academic standards. I would like to see the sites that said file not found to be updated to the new correct link.

The article touched on immigration a bunch. I think it could have touched on more parts of the individual races in brazil, tell where the different races live within brazil and such.  It focused to much on where the people of brazil came from, but it didn’t even really describe why people emigrated to brazil in the first place.  The talk page did not have very many different conversations going on, except one that really just destroyed the entire article.

The comment said that the article was terrible, did not site enough and did not give people enough info on certain information stated within the article. And the rest of the talk page also just really discuses what the author of the article did wrong and what they should do to fix it. The article is also part of four wikiprojects, it is part of sociology, Anthropology, ethnic groups, and Geography.